Sweepstakes Casino Controversy – And Celebrities’ All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday’s hearing on prohibited gaming.

No, they weren’t personally in participation, however the world-famous celebrities were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments – the controversial websites using both totally free casino-style video games and lucrative prizes, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can ‘play for totally free,’ while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to mention suit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as standard casinos, just without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren’t based on regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the company deals with accusations of prohibited gambling in a New york city suit that claims VGW uses celebrity endorsers to ‘produce a veneer of legitimacy’ around its product. (See VGW’s statement listed below)

‘I’m not sure” if you don’t trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton” is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,’ Friday’s presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a series of celebs from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George – none of whom use any distinctions in between standard gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes casinos found online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of – but not all – games are totally free

Drake has a handle social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly promotes on social networks

Find out more

Donald Trump ‘set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy’

Instead, ads generally center around the social element of the casinos, while omitting the potential for actual gambling losses.

Others lure clients with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad revealing off Drake’s vehicles, planes and estates before pivoting to video of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

‘Daddy, why do we have so much cash?’ read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: ‘Because I never ever offered up.’

The inconsistency between sports betting sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complex, however operators of the latter insist they’re not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, many of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for complimentary.

‘Most social sweeps clients never purchase,’ the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. ‘The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming websites.’

Social casinos provide customers an opportunity to play casino-style video games with friends. Players have the choice to buy valueless currency typically referred to as ‘gold coins,’ which can not be exchanged for genuine cash, however can be used to open different functions within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, permitting consumers to acquire other currency called ‘sweeps coins’ that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers’ Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake’s cars, planes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW’s Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7 states, which has assisted to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which don’t need typically require recognition. However, sites like Chumba will request IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable consumers to send mail-in ask for totally free sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully specific guidelines. What’s more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, consequently providing them a factor to try their hands at any variety of casino games for a chance to win – or lose – genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a method of promoting their support.

‘Social sweepstakes games are simply a kind of online entertainment,’ an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by e-mail. ‘No purchase is required to play at social casinos with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever have to spend for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a – or” consideration” – is a vital difference in between social sweeps and conventional online gaming websites like casinos.’

Think about the method that McDonald’s utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren’t paying to gamble, but rather they’re buying hamburgers and fries that offer them the chance to win financially rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or ‘consideration’, the game itself does not meet the definition of gambling in the US.

‘Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all kinds of daily organizations in the United States, everything from hamburgers to publication memberships to coffee and home improvement shops,’ the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. ‘Sweepstakes promos are regularly used by a who’s who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.’

But to many gambling industry insiders, that argument doesn’t cut it.

For starters, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald’s Monopoly game doesn’t run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, consequently recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant’s primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

‘They don’t last permanently and they’re normally not tied to casino-style video games of possibility,’ Wallach told DailyMail.com. ‘They’re simply money giveaways.

‘The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the characteristics commonly related to McDonald’s-design sweepstakes promotions,’ Wallach continued. ‘Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos offer” casino-like” payouts, usually 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the normal payout portion for a momentary promotional sweepstakes is a trivial share of the income earned by the business [generally less than one percent]’

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, providing clients the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar establishments have given that been shuttered over allegations of illegal gaming.

DJ Khaled is among a number of celeb spokespeople for VGW’s Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to face similar analysis.

‘These differences are not approximate,’ Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. ‘They have consistently been pointed out by courts and state chief law officer as essential aspects in figuring out that a sweepstakes promo remained in reality a guise for illegal gaming.’

One of the casino market’s leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the problem.

‘Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are giving up considerable tax and income opportunities as this gaming changes that conducted through managed channels,’ read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent claim, which is largely comparable to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an ‘illegal gaming enterprise. ‘

Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as accuseds in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com’s ask for remark.

‘We normally don’t discuss matters before the courts,’ a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com via e-mail. ‘However, we note that this claim has actually only just been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

‘We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we run, and stay positive about the future,’ the representative continued. ‘We continue to offer our free-to-play video games across most of North America, as we have for more than a decade, developing not just terrific video games, user experiences and home entertainment, however likewise guaranteeing this is done safely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.

‘More broadly, we ‘d repeat that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly common across the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to intensely safeguard any claim which might be brought against us.’

The issues between traditional online gaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments could show problematic for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers’ George both back VGW’s Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

‘It’s paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting ‘sweeps’ websites while at the same time the leagues desire to project a strong stance against illegal gaming – specifically when attempting to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,’ Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter’s scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting allegedly prohibited gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

‘I ‘d anticipate that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,’ Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players’ agents reacted to DailyMail.com’s demands for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a duty to explain to customers the distinctions and similarities between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

‘We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our service practices more broadly,’ the spokesperson said. ‘Some of our worths are” our players come first” and” we do what’s right”, and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.’

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

‘Celebrities who lend their names to dubious illegal gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege harm,’ Glaser said. ‘There is also some threat that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with prohibited gambling.’

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton